Gopher Protocol, Inc. v. Discover Growth Fund, LLC
| GOPHER PROTOCOL, INC. |
| DISCOVER GROWTH FUND, LLC, A U.S. Virgin Island Limited Liability company |
| 19-17557 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: ME) Granting motion to dismiss the case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b) filed by Appellant Discover Growth Fund, LLC. This order shall constitute the mandate. [11551588] (ME) [Entered: 01/06/2020 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Discover Growth Fund, LLC Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 12/31/2019. [11547821] [19-17557] (Olsen, Eric) [Entered: 12/31/2019 11:41 AM] |
| Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Dylan T. Ciciliano for party(s) Appellant Discover Growth Fund, LLC, in case 19-17557. [11547819] (RR) [Entered: 12/31/2019 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/30/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11547331]. [19-17557] (AD) [Entered: 12/30/2019 06:45 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Discover Growth Fund, LLC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/30/2019. [11547316] [19-17557] (Olsen, Eric) [Entered: 12/30/2019 06:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Dylan Thomas Ciciliano (Garman Turner Gordon, LLP, 650 White Drive, Ste. 100, Las Vegas, NV 89119) for Appellant Discover Growth Fund, LLC. Date of service: 12/30/2019. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11547309] [19-17557] (Ciciliano, Dylan) [Entered: 12/30/2019 05:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because the challenged November 25, 2019 district court order may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Blalock Eddy Ranch v. MCI Telecomms. Corp., 982 F.2d 371, 374 (9th Cir. 1992) (order of contempt not final or appealable until sanctions imposed); Jensen Elec. Co. v. Moore, Caldwell, Rowland & Dodd, Inc., 873 F.2d 1327, 1329 (9th Cir. 1989) (order awarding sanctions not appealable until amount of sanctions determined). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11543495] (OC) [Entered: 12/24/2019 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Discover Growth Fund, LLC Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/30/2019. Transcript ordered by 01/21/2020. Transcript due 02/18/2020. Appellant Discover Growth Fund, LLC opening brief due 03/30/2020. Appellee Gopher Protocol, Inc. answering brief due 04/28/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11542630] (HC) [Entered: 12/23/2019 03:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
