Ivan Cleveland v. B. Min, et al
| B. D. MIN, Pastor, M. VOONG, Chief Office of Appeals and J. VILA, Appeals Examiner, Office of Appeals |
| IVAN VERNORD CLEVELAND |
| 19-17598 |
| December 31, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (RAP, MDS and NRS) [11599063] (NAC) [Entered: 02/18/2020 07:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (RICHARD A. PAEZ, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and N. RANDY SMITH) : A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal, served on December 15, 2019 and filed on December 23, 2019, was not filed or delivered to prison officials within 30 days after the district courts judgment entered on July 16, 2019. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11574286] (RT) [Entered: 01/24/2020 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Ivan Vernord Cleveland motion for extension of time to comply. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/13/2020. [11566046] (QDL) [Entered: 01/17/2020 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Ivan Vernord Cleveland opening brief due 02/21/2020. [11547483] (JMR) [Entered: 12/31/2019 09:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
