Cecil Fort v. Shawn Hatton
| CECIL LAMAR FORT |
| SHAWN HATTON, Warden, Salinas Valley |
| 19-17599 |
| December 31, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 28, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Cecil Lamar Fort motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11578499] (NAC) [Entered: 01/29/2020 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 12/05/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11547521] (JMR) [Entered: 12/31/2019 09:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Cecil Fort v. Shawn Hatton | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: CECIL LAMAR FORT | |
| Represented By: | Cecil Lamar Fort |
| Represented By: | Robert Joseph Beles |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: SHAWN HATTON, Warden, Salinas Valley | |
| Represented By: | David Rose |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
