USA v. Stephen Howe
Defendant / Appellant: STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER HOWE
Plaintiff / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 19-30023
Filed: January 30, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 9, 2020 USA V. STEPHEN HOWE

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 19, 2019 Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): The appellants motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) for an extension of time to designate transcripts is granted. On or before April 12, 2019, the appellant shall designate the transcripts. The transcripts are due May 13, 2019. The opening brief is due June 24, 2019. The answering brief is due July 24, 2019. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after the service of the answering brief. The Clerk will send a copy of this order to the court reporter at the district court.[11234448] (JPD) [Entered: 03/19/2019 03:12 PM]
March 7, 2019 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Stephen Christopher Howe Motion to extend the time to file appellant designation of reporters transcript until 04/08/2019. Date of service: 03/07/2019. [11219483] [19-30023] (Bigelow, Michael) [Entered: 03/07/2019 11:36 AM]
March 6, 2019 Filing 5 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Mr. Michael Bradley Bigelow, Esquire for Stephen Christopher Howe) [11217604] (DO) [Entered: 03/06/2019 09:17 AM]
February 27, 2019 Filing 4 Terminated Natasha M. Norris, Esq., as counsel of record for Stephen Christopher Howe in 19-30023. (DC granted motion to withdraw on 2/11/19; DE No. 122) [11208994] (DL) [Entered: 02/27/2019 07:40 AM]
February 22, 2019 Filing 3 Added attorney Michael Bradley Bigelow for Stephen Christopher Howe, in case 19-30023. [11205276] (RR) [Entered: 02/22/2019 04:50 PM]
February 22, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Michael B. Bigelow (CJA Appointed in District Court) for Appellant Stephen Christopher Howe. Substitution for Attorney Natasha M. Norris for Appellant Stephen Christopher Howe. Date of service: 02/22/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11203989] [19-30023] (Bigelow, Michael) [Entered: 02/22/2019 09:46 AM]
January 30, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: 180 Months. Transcript ordered by 02/20/2019. Transcript due 03/22/2019. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 05/01/2019 for Stephen Christopher Howe. Appellee brief due 05/31/2019 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11173429] (JPD) [Entered: 01/30/2019 04:29 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Stephen Howe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: STEPHEN CHRISTOPHER HOWE
Represented By: Michael Bradley Bigelow Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Andrea Whittier Hattan
Represented By: Kyle F. Reardon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?