NRDC, et al v. David Bernhardt, et al
CONOCOPHILLIPS ALASKA, INC. |
BUREAU OF LAND MANAGEMENT, KAREN MOURITSEN, in her official capacity as Acting Alaska State Director of the Bureau of Land Management and DAVID LONGLY BERNHARDT, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary of the Interior |
NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and GREENPEACE, INC. |
19-35006 |
January 4, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 Added attorneys Thekla Hansen-Young and Kevin William McArdle for appellees BLM, David Longly Bernhardt and Karen Mouritsen, in case 19-35006. [11208679] (HH) [Entered: 02/26/2019 04:08 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kevin W. McArdle for Appellees David Longly Bernhardt, BLM and Karen Mouritsen. Date of service: 02/26/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11208430] [19-35006] (McArdle, Kevin) [Entered: 02/26/2019 02:46 PM] |
Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. [11208397] (LW) [Entered: 02/26/2019 02:39 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Thekla Hansen-Young for Appellees BLM, David Longly Bernhardt and Karen Mouritsen. Date of service: 02/26/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11207182] [19-35006] (Hansen-Young, Thekla) [Entered: 02/26/2019 06:10 AM] |
Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 02/04/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11151998] (LW) [Entered: 01/14/2019 01:36 PM] |
Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/11/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11150252] (AD) [Entered: 01/11/2019 12:44 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Inc. and NRDC Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/11/2019. [11150245] [19-35006] (Noblin, Rebecca) [Entered: 01/11/2019 12:40 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 01/11/2019. Transcript ordered by 02/04/2019. Transcript due 03/04/2019. Appellants Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Earth, Greenpeace, Inc. and Natural Resources Defense Council opening brief due 04/15/2019. Appellees David Longly Bernhardt, Bureau of Land Management, Conocophillips Alaska, Inc. and Karen Mouritsen answering brief due 05/13/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11141413] (JBS) [Entered: 01/04/2019 10:24 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.