Adree Edmo v. Corizon, Inc., et al
| HOWARD KEITH YORDY, RICHARD CRAIG, JEFF ZUMDA, RONA SIEGERT, IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and HENRY ATENCIO |
| MURRAY YOUNG, CORIZON, INC., SCOTT ELIASON and CATHERINE WHINNERY |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| ADREE EDMO, AKA Mason Edmo |
| 19-35017 |
| January 10, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 Edmo v. Corizon, Inc.
|
|
ADREE EDMO V. CORIZON, INC.
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 Filed (ECF) Appellants Henry Atencio, Richard Craig, Idaho Department of Corrections, Rona Siegert, Howard Keith Yordy and Jeff Zumda in 19-35019 Joint Motion to stay lower court action. Date of service: 03/08/2019. [11221868] [19-35017, 19-35019] (Hall, Brady) [Entered: 03/08/2019 04:17 PM] |
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) UNDER SEAL Appellants Corizon, Inc., Scott Eliason, Catherine Whinnery and Murray Young in 19-35017 motion to file document under seal and submit sealed document. Type of document: excerpts of record. Date of service: 03/06/2019. [11218513] [19-35019, 19-35017]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected pdfs. 03/08/2019 by LA] (Hall, Brady) [Entered: 03/06/2019 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) presentence report UNDER SEAL by Appellants Henry Atencio, Richard Craig, Idaho Department of Corrections, Rona Siegert, Howard Keith Yordy and Jeff Zumda in 19-35019, Appellants Corizon, Inc., Scott Eliason, Catherine Whinnery and Murray Young in 19-35017. [11218479] [19-35019, 19-35017]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected pdf, updated docket text to reflect all party filers. 03/08/2019 by LA] (Hall, Brady) [Entered: 03/06/2019 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 12 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellants Henry Atencio, Richard Craig, Idaho Department of Corrections, Rona Siegert, Howard Keith Yordy and Jeff Zumda in 19-35019, Appellants Corizon, Inc., Scott Eliason, Catherine Whinnery and Murray Young in 19-35017. Date of service: 03/06/2019. [11218474] [19-35019, 19-35017]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts. 03/08/2019 by LA] (Hall, Brady) [Entered: 03/06/2019 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 11 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellants Henry Atencio, Richard Craig, Idaho Department of Corrections, Rona Siegert, Howard Keith Yordy, and Jeff Zumda, Appellants Corizon, Inc., Scott Eliason, Catherine Whinnery, and Murray Young. Date of service: 03/06/2019. [11218341] [19-35019, 19-35017]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief, updated docket text to reflect correct party filers. 03/08/2019 by LA] (Hall, Brady) [Entered: 03/06/2019 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TAH): The appellants joint motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 9 ] ) for an extension of time in which to file the opening briefs is granted. The appellants opening briefs are due March 6, 2019. The appellees consolidated answering brief is due April 6, 2019 or within 28 days after service of the last-served opening brief, whichever is earlier. The appellants optional reply briefs are due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11187817] [19-35017, 19-35019] (JPD) [Entered: 02/12/2019 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants Henry Atencio, Richard Craig, Idaho Department of Corrections, Rona Siegert, Howard Keith Yordy and Jeff Zumda in 19-35019 Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 03/06/2019. Date of service: 01/29/2019. [11171974] [19-35017, 19-35019] (Crecelius, Marisa) [Entered: 01/29/2019 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TAH): The parties stipulated motions (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ] in No. 19-35017, Docket Entry No. [ # 11161869-2 ] in No. 19-35019) to consolidate appeal Nos. 19-35017 and 19- 35019 are granted. The appellants opening briefs are due February 6, 2019. The appellees consolidated answering brief is due March 6, 2019 or within 28 days after service of the last-served opening brief, whichever is earlier. The appellants optional reply briefs are due within 21 days after service of the consolidated answering brief. [11165356] [19-35017, 19-35019] (AF) [Entered: 01/24/2019 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. The briefing schedule previously established by the court remains in effect. [11164922] (LW) [Entered: 01/24/2019 10:54 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Corizon, Inc., Scott Eliason, Catherine Whinnery and Murray Young Motion to consolidate cases 19-35019; 19-35017. Date of service: 01/23/2019. [11163590] [19-35017] (Eaton, Dylan) [Entered: 01/23/2019 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 01/23/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11154184] (LW) [Entered: 01/15/2019 03:31 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 01/14/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11152907] (AD) [Entered: 01/14/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Corizon, Inc., Scott Eliason, Catherine Whinnery and Murray Young Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 01/14/2019. [11152234] [19-35017] (Eaton, Dylan) [Entered: 01/14/2019 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): The appeal filed January 9, 2019 is a preliminary injunction appeal. Accordingly, Ninth Circuit Rule 3-3 shall apply. The mediation questionnaire is due three days after the date of this order. If they have not already done so, within 7 calendar days after the filing date of this order, the parties shall make arrangements to obtain from the court reporter an official transcript of proceedings in the district court that will be included in the record on appeal. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief and excerpts of record are due not later than February 6, 2019; the answering brief is due March 6, 2019 or 28 days after service of the opening brief, whichever is earlier; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 3-3(b). No streamlined extensions of time will be approved. See 9th Cir. R. 31-2.2(a)(3). Any request for an extension of time to file a brief must be made by written motion under Ninth Circuit Rule 31-2.2(b). Failure to file timely the opening brief shall result in the automatic dismissal of this appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [11149085] (AF) [Entered: 01/10/2019 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: to be set. Preliminary Injunction Appeal. C.R. 3-3. [11147991] (RT) [Entered: 01/10/2019 09:17 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
