Lionel Ellison v. Yellowstone County, et al
DANNY TENENBAUM, B. RICHARDSON, GROSLOCK, Officer, CHAD WRIGHT, SCOTT TWITO, PETERS, Sgt., JULIE MEES, METZER, Lt., YELLOWSTONE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, MICHAEL KAKUK, MIKE LINDER, Yellowstone Deputy, FRANK FRITZ, WASHINGTON, Officer, BILLINGS POLICE DEPARTMENT, JOHNSON, Officer, BOFTO, Capt., YELLOWSTONE COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, YELLOWSTONE COUNTY and BRETT LINNEWEBER |
LIONEL SCOTT ELLISON |
19-35021 |
January 10, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (SRT, RMG and RAP) [11203986] (RR) [Entered: 02/22/2019 09:45 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Lionel Scott Ellison motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: case closed. [11171714] (RR) [Entered: 01/29/2019 03:20 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS, RONALD M. GOULD and RICHARD A. PAEZ) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11165809] (WL) [Entered: 01/24/2019 03:39 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lionel Scott Ellison opening brief due 03/11/2019. Appellees Billings Police Department, Bofto, Frank Fritz, Groslock, Johnson, Michael Kakuk, Mike Linder, Brett Linneweber, Julie Mees, Metzer, Peters, B. Richardson, Danny Tenenbaum, Scott Twito, Washington, Chad Wright, Yellowstone County, Yellowstone County Attorney's Office and Yellowstone County Sheriff's Department answering brief due 04/09/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11148639] (HC) [Entered: 01/10/2019 01:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.