Steven Berliner v. Brian Geers
Petitioner / Appellant: STEVEN JAMES BERLINER
Respondent / Appellee: BRIAN GEERS and ELLEN ROSENBLUM
Case Number: 19-35057
Filed: January 25, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 16, 2020 STEVEN BERLINER V. BRIAN GEERS

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 20, 2019 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): Appellees unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) to amend the case caption to remove Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum is granted. The caption will be amended to reflect that Brian Geers is the proper appellee in this case. Appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due May 24, 2019. The answering brief is due June 24, 2019. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11235097] (OC) [Entered: 03/20/2019 09:34 AM]
March 6, 2019 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Steven James Berliner Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 05/24/2019. Date of service: 03/06/2019. [11218439] [19-35057] (Brown, Nell) [Entered: 03/06/2019 02:44 PM]
February 19, 2019 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee Brian Geers Unopposed Motion for miscellaneous relief [UNOPPOSED MOTION TO CORRECT CASE CAPTION]. Date of service: 02/19/2019. [11199872] [19-35057] (Kahn, Ryan) [Entered: 02/19/2019 03:07 PM]
January 31, 2019 Filing 3 Attorney Kristen Boyd substituted by Attorney Ryan P. Kahn. [11173882] (RL) [Entered: 01/31/2019 09:37 AM]
January 31, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Ryan Kahn for Appellees Brian Geers and Ellen Rosenblum. Substitution for Attorney Ms. Kristen Boyd for Appellees Brian Geers and Ellen Rosenblum. Date of service: 01/31/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11173707] [19-35057] (Kahn, Ryan) [Entered: 01/31/2019 08:41 AM]
January 25, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Steven James Berliner opening brief due 03/25/2019. Appellees Brian Geers and Ellen Rosenblum answering brief due 04/25/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11167140] (RT) [Entered: 01/25/2019 01:42 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Steven Berliner v. Brian Geers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: STEVEN JAMES BERLINER
Represented By: Nell Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: BRIAN GEERS
Represented By: Ryan P. Kahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ELLEN ROSENBLUM
Represented By: Ryan P. Kahn
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?