Jamie Pendleton v. City of Spokane Police Departm, et al
| LAWRENCE HENRY HASKELL, Prosecutor, CITY OF SPOKANE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF SPOKANE, a municipal corporation, MICHAEL ROBERGE, Civil Enforcement Unit Officer, SPOKANE COUNTY PROSECUTERS OFFICE, BRENDA NELSON, Legal Secretary, JACOB KUHN, Legal Secretary Spokane County Prosecutor's Office, STACEY CARR, Civil Enforcement Detective, SPOKANE COUNTY, CASEY EVANS, Deputy Prosecutor and CITY OF SPOKANE PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE |
| JAMIE C. PENDLETON |
| 19-35081 |
| January 31, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Jamie C. Pendleton's opening brief (Informal: Yes) 17 pages. Served on 02/12/2019. Major deficiencies: motion to proceed in forma pauperis, motion to for appointment of consel pending. [11207694] (GV) [Entered: 02/26/2019 10:38 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Jamie C. Pendleton letter dated 02/12/2019 re: request for copy of docket sheet. Paper filing deficiency: None. (Sent Appellant copy of docket sheet) [11201610] (QDL) [Entered: 02/20/2019 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Jamie C. Pendleton statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 02/12/2019. [11201606] (QDL) [Entered: 02/20/2019 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Jamie C. Pendleton motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/05/2019. [11187577] (QDL) [Entered: 02/12/2019 02:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Jamie C. Pendleton motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/07/2019. [11185958] (QDL) [Entered: 02/11/2019 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11178480] (CKP) [Entered: 02/04/2019 03:21 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO COUNSEL FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jamie C. Pendleton opening brief due 04/01/2019.[11173988] (JPD) [Entered: 01/31/2019 09:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
