John Scannell v. Washington State Bar Assoc., et al
| MARY E. FAIRHURST, Administrative Law Judge, DEBRA L. STEPHENS, MARY I. YU, in their official and administrative capacities, CHRISTOPHER LANESE, SHERYL GORDON MCCLOUD, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON, KIM WYMAN, in her official and administrative capacity of Secretary of State for Washington State, SUSAN J OWEN, BARBARA A. MADSEN, CHARLES K. WIGGENS, RICARDO MARTINEZ, BENJAMIN H. SETTLE, WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOCIATION, KAREN UNGER, STATE OF WASHINGTON, CHARLES W. JOHNSON and STEVEN C. GONZALEZ |
| JOHN R. SCANNELL, Esquire, AKA Zamboni |
| 19-35203 |
| March 15, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| JOHN SCANNELL V. WASHINGTON STATE BAR ASSOC. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant John R. Scannell opening brief due 05/14/2019. Appellees Mary E. Fairhurst, Administrative Law Judge, Steven C. Gonzalez, Charles W. Johnson, Christopher Lanese, Barbara A. Madsen, Ricardo Martinez, Sheryl Gordon McCloud, Susan J Owen, Benjamin H. Settle, State of Washington, Debra L. Stephens, Karen Unger, United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, Washington State Bar Association, Charles K. Wiggens, Kim Wyman and Mary I. Yu answering brief due 06/13/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11229060] (JBS) [Entered: 03/15/2019 09:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
