Kirk Marshall v. Nancy Berryhill
Plaintiff / Appellant: KIRK ALLEN MARSHALL
Defendant / Appellee: NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Case Number: 19-35303
Filed: April 12, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 14, 2020 KIRK MARSHALL V. ANDREW SAUL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 22, 2019 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the Ninth Cir. Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See FRAP 33 & Ninth Cir.R. 33-1. Mediation assessment conferences are not routinely scheduled in social security appeals. Csl are encouraged to contact circuit mediator if they believe this social security appeal has remand potential or is otherwise amenable to resolution. Specifically, csl are requested to contact the mediator if claimant has been awarded benefits after the district court's decision or if claimant is deceased. The mediator can also assist csl with procedural matters that may lead to the resolution of an appeal. Csl for the party contacting the Mediation Program are encouraged to copy csl for the other party to the appeal on any such requests. Info regarding the medation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [11272353] (LW) [Entered: 04/22/2019 02:21 PM]
April 22, 2019 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/22/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11272090] (AD) [Entered: 04/22/2019 12:45 PM]
April 22, 2019 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kirk Allen Marshall Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/22/2019. [11271859] [19-35303] (Talbot, Charles) [Entered: 04/22/2019 11:00 AM]
April 12, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/19/2019. Appellant Kirk Allen Marshall opening brief due 06/11/2019. Appellee Nancy A. Berryhill answering brief due 07/11/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11262587] (HH) [Entered: 04/12/2019 03:23 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kirk Marshall v. Nancy Berryhill
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KIRK ALLEN MARSHALL
Represented By: Charles W. Talbot
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Acting Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: Jeffrey Raymond McClain
Represented By: Benjamin J. Groebner
Represented By: Kerry Keefe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?