Dan Goodrick v. Ashley Dowell, et al
| IDAHO BOARD OF CORRECTIONS and IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION |
| ASHLEY DOWELL, TIM MCKAY, JEFF ZMUDA, KEVIN KEMPF, LARISSA PFIEFER, AMANDA GOLDFUSS, TERRI JO KIRTLEY, ALBERTO RAMIREZ, DAINA DRAKE, BRENT REINKE, VALLEY and SUSAN WESSELS |
| DAN GOODRICK |
| 19-35310 |
| April 17, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed original and 7 copies of Appellant Dan Goodrick (Informal: No) opening brief of 23 pages. Served on 06/06/2019. [11327422] (LA) [Entered: 06/11/2019 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 4 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11294785] (CKP) [Entered: 05/13/2019 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 05/06/2019. [Case Number 19-35310: Partially Paid] [11292399] (CW) [Entered: 05/09/2019 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11281782] (CKP) [Entered: 04/30/2019 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Dan Goodrick opening brief due 06/17/2019. Appellees Ashley Dowell, Daina Drake, Amanda Goldfuss, Kevin Kempf, Terri Jo Kirtley, Tim McKay, Larissa Pfiefer, Alberto Ramirez, Brent Reinke, Valley, Susan Wessels and Jeff Zmuda answering brief due 07/15/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11266935] (JPD) [Entered: 04/17/2019 11:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
