USA, et al v. Bradley Monical
| BRADLEY WILLIAM MONICAL |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-35375 |
| May 2, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 20, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Bradley William Monical motion to stay appellate proceedings. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/15/2019. [11303524] (QDL) [Entered: 05/20/2019 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 03/04/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11285051] (JMR) [Entered: 05/02/2019 02:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA, et al v. Bradley Monical | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: BRADLEY WILLIAM MONICAL | |
| Represented By: | Bradley William Monical |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Frank Papagni |
| Represented By: | Amy Potter |
| Represented By: | Kelly A. Zusman |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
