Jason McFarlin v. Andrew Saul
| JASON D. MCFARLIN |
| NANCY A. BERRYHILL, Commissioner Social Security Administration and ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security |
| 19-35406 |
| May 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Nancy A. Berryhill substituted by Andrew M. Saul effective 06/19/2019. [Created 06/19/2019 by AUTOUPD][11338367][19-35406] (CD) [Entered: 06/19/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and CARLOS T. BEA): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the district court has not issued any orders that are final or appealable and the district court action remains pending. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11318066] (AF) [Entered: 06/03/2019 04:48 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Jason D. McFarlin motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/07/2019. [11290646] (JBS) [Entered: 05/08/2019 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jason D. McFarlin opening brief due 07/08/2019. Appellee Nancy A. Berryhill answering brief due 08/05/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11290637] (JBS) [Entered: 05/08/2019 11:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
