Bark, et al v. USFS, et al
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Plaintiff / Appellant: OREGON WILD, WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, BARK and CASCADIA WILDLANDS
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee: HIGH CASCADE, INC.
Case Number: 19-35442
Filed: May 23, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2019 Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Appellants Bark, Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild Correspondence: Follow-up letter requesting action regarding the Court's jurisdictional question. Date of service: 06/28/2019 [11348595] [19-35442] (Bell, Brenna) [Entered: 06/28/2019 12:54 PM]
June 26, 2019 Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11345916] (BS) [Entered: 06/26/2019 03:59 PM]
June 7, 2019 Filing 10 Terminated Jennifer Schwartz for WildEarth Guardians, Oregon Wild, Cascadia Wildlands and Bark in 19-35442 [11323960] (JFF) [Entered: 06/07/2019 04:06 PM]
June 7, 2019 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellants Bark, Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild Correspondence: This letter responds to the Clerk's May 31 Order showing cause why this Court has jurisdiction over the appeal.. Date of service: 06/07/2019 [11323472] [19-35442] (Bell, Brenna) [Entered: 06/07/2019 12:53 PM]
June 7, 2019 Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 06/26/2019, 1:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [11323250] (BS) [Entered: 06/07/2019 10:51 AM]
June 7, 2019 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Jennifer Schwartz for Appellants Bark, Cascadia Wildlands, Oregon Wild and WildEarth Guardians. Party proceeding without counsel: No. Date of service: 06/07/2019. [11323037] [19-35442] (Schwartz, Jennifer) [Entered: 06/07/2019 09:04 AM]
June 5, 2019 Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/05/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11320596] (AD) [Entered: 06/05/2019 12:44 PM]
June 5, 2019 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants Bark, Cascadia Wildlands and Oregon Wild Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/05/2019. [11320312] [19-35442] (Bell, Brenna) [Entered: 06/05/2019 10:27 AM]
June 3, 2019 Filing 4 Added attorney Jeffrey S. Beelaert for USFS, in case 19-35442. [11317748] (JFF) [Entered: 06/03/2019 03:03 PM]
June 3, 2019 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jeffrey S. Beelaert for Appellee USFS. Date of service: 06/03/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11317393] [19-35442] (Beelaert, Jeffrey) [Entered: 06/03/2019 01:24 PM]
May 31, 2019 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: SM): This courts jurisdiction is limited to final decisions of the district court. Natl Distribution Agency v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 117 F.3d 432, 433 (9th Cir. 1997). A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over the appeal because it does not appear that the district courts May 7, 2019 order was final where the docket states Opinion to follow. See id. (A ruling is final for purposes of [28 U.S.C.] 1291 if it (1) is a full adjudication of the issues, and (2) clearly evidences the judges intention that it be the courts final act in the matter. (citations and internal quotation marks omitted)); see also United States v. Samango, 607 F.2d 877, 880 (9th Cir. 1979) (time to appeal did not begin to run upon entry of oral ruling on docket because district court repeatedly expressed intent to issue written order incorporating and elucidating ruling). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellants shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellants elect to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellants do not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11315165] (OC) [Entered: 05/31/2019 11:10 AM]
May 23, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/30/2019. Appellants Bark, Cascadia Wildlands, Oregon Wild and WildEarth Guardians opening brief due 07/23/2019. Appellees High Cascade, Inc. and United States Forest Service answering brief due 08/23/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11306887] (RT) [Entered: 05/23/2019 09:38 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bark, et al v. USFS, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE
Represented By: Krystal-Rose Perez
Represented By: Shaun M. Pettigrew
Represented By: Jeffrey S. Beelaert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: OREGON WILD
Represented By: Jennifer Schwartz
Represented By: Nicholas Stanton Cady
Represented By: Brenna Benine Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: WILDEARTH GUARDIANS
Represented By: Jennifer Schwartz
Represented By: Nicholas Stanton Cady
Represented By: Brenna Benine Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BARK
Represented By: Jennifer Schwartz
Represented By: Nicholas Stanton Cady
Represented By: Brenna Benine Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: CASCADIA WILDLANDS
Represented By: Jennifer Schwartz
Represented By: Nicholas Stanton Cady
Represented By: Brenna Benine Bell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Intervenor defendant / appellee: HIGH CASCADE, INC.
Represented By: Sara Ghafouri
Represented By: Lawson Emmett Fite
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?