Brandon Walker v. Colette Peters, et al
| GARTH GULICK, M.D., (SRCI), MARK NOOTH, Acting Eastside Director Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC), JOHN DOES, All, (ODOC/SRCI), S. WILCOX, Health Services Manager, (SRCI), BRYON HEMPHILL, M.D., (SRCI), ASHLEY CLEMENTS, Health Services Manager, (SRCI), MIKE GROVER, Assistant Director of Operations (ODOC), ROBERT WHITE, Health Services Manager, (SRCI), BILL HOEFEL, Administrator, Health Services (ODOC), JULIE WARDEN, Health Services Supervisor, (SRCI), ALL SRCI HEALTH CARE RNS, COLETTE S. PETERS, Director et al. Oregon Department of Corrections (ODOC), STEVEN SHELTON, Dr., Director of Health Services, (ODOC), JOE DAFOE, Administrator Health Services, (ODOC), JANE DOES, All, (ODOC/SRCI), HEATHER VILLANEUEVA, Adminstrator, Health Services (ODOC), LISA KOLTES, M.D.,(SRCI), AIMEE HUGHES, Health Services Manager, (SRCI), KIM BROCKAMP, Assistant Director, (ODOC), ALL ODOC AGENTS AND ALL SRCI AGENTS and BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution (SRCI) |
| BRANDON LEE WALKER |
| 19-35485 |
| June 4, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Sent Appellant a copy of the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to his letter of request filed on 07-05-2019. [11355889] (JR) [Entered: 07/08/2019 08:49 AM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Brandon Lee Walker motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [11355383] (NAC) [Entered: 07/05/2019 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Brandon Lee Walker request for copy of rules. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11355376] (NAC) [Entered: 07/05/2019 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Brandon Lee Walker Statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 06/20/2019. [11342548] (NAC) [Entered: 06/24/2019 03:08 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Brandon Lee Walker supplemental motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11342541] (NAC) [Entered: 06/24/2019 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 6 ENTRY UPDATED. Received original and 6 copies of Appellant Brandon Lee Walker opening brief (Informal: No) 17 pages. Major deficiencies motion and OSC pending. [11334349] --[Edited 07/24/2019 by GV to add 6 copies. Add'l copies received 7/22/19] (KWG) [Entered: 06/17/2019 02:57 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Brandon Lee Walker motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [11333344] (NAC) [Entered: 06/17/2019 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 4 Attorneys Nathaniel Aggrey in 19-35485 substituted by Attorney Denise Gale Fjordbeck in 19-35485 [11328532] (NAC) [Entered: 06/12/2019 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Denise G. Fjordbeck for Appellees Kim Brockamp, Brad Cain, Ashley Clements, Joe DaFoe, Mike Grover, Garth Gulick, Bryon Hemphill, Bill Hoefel, Aimee Hughes, Lisa Koltes, Mark Nooth, Colette S. Peters, Steven Shelton, Heather Villaneueva, Julie Warden, Robert White and S. Wilcox. Substitution for Attorney Nathaniel Aggrey for Appellees Kim Brockamp, Brad Cain, Ashley Clements, Joe DaFoe, Mike Grover, Garth Gulick, Bryon Hemphill, Bill Hoefel, Aimee Hughes, Lisa Koltes, Mark Nooth, Colette S. Peters, Steven Shelton, Heather Villaneueva, Julie Warden, Robert White and S. Wilcox. Date of service: 06/12/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11328525] [19-35485] (Fjordbeck, Denise) [Entered: 06/12/2019 01:17 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has denied appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis for appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11321878] (CKP) [Entered: 06/06/2019 11:23 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Brandon Lee Walker opening brief due 07/30/2019. Appellees All ODOC Agents and All SRCI Agents, All SRCI Health Care RNs, Kim Brockamp, Brad Cain, Ashley Clements, Joe DaFoe, Jane Does, John Does, Mike Grover, Garth Gulick, Bryon Hemphill, Bill Hoefel, Aimee Hughes, Lisa Koltes, Mark Nooth, Colette S. Peters, Steven Shelton, Heather Villaneueva, Julie Warden, Robert White and S. Wilcox answering brief due 08/29/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11319106] (HC) [Entered: 06/04/2019 12:09 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
