Vincent Badkin v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al
| INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, DISTRICT 160 AND LOCAL LODGE 282, a Washington labor union and LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation, DBA Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company |
| VINCENT LYLE BADKIN |
| 19-35524 |
| June 21, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| VINCENT BADKIN V. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION |
| VINCENT BADKIN V. LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Streamlined request [17] by Appellant Vincent Lyle Badkin in 19-35524, Appellee Vincent Lyle Badkin in 19-35559, 19-35576 to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: First cross-appeal brief due 09/19/2019 for Vincent Lyle Badkin. Second brief on cross-appeal due 10/21/2019 for International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District 160 and Local Lodge 282 and Lockheed Martin Corporation. Third brief on cross-appeal due 11/20/2019 for Vincent Lyle Badkin. The optional reply cross-appeal brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the third brief on cross-appeal. [11401910] [19-35524, 19-35559, 19-35576] (JN) [Entered: 08/19/2019 12:14 PM] |
| Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Vincent Lyle Badkin. New requested due date is 09/19/2019. [11401890] [19-35524] (Chabuk, Ahmet) [Entered: 08/19/2019 12:04 PM] |
| Filing 16 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 07/23/2019. [11375671] [19-35576, 19-35524, 19-35559] (RT) [Entered: 07/24/2019 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 15 Added Attorney(s) Kyle Nelson for party(s) Appellee Lockheed Martin Corporation, in case 19-35524. [11372417] [19-35524, 19-35559, 19-35576] (RR) [Entered: 07/22/2019 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 14 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: $505.00 USD . Date paid: 07/22/2019. [11372398] [19-35559, 19-35524, 19-35576]--[Edited: added amount paid. 07/22/2019 by SLM] (RT) [Entered: 07/22/2019 04:20 PM] |
| Filing 13 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kyle Dale Nelson (Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C. 1201 Third Avenue, Suite 5150 Seattle, WA 98101) for Appellant Lockheed Martin Corporation in 19-35576. Date of service: 07/22/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11372295] [19-35559, 19-35524, 19-35576] (Nelson, Kyle) [Entered: 07/22/2019 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 12 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Meant for case 19-35559. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Original Text: Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11366423] [19-35559, 19-35524, 19-35576] (TSP) [Entered: 07/17/2019 11:29 AM] |
| Filing 11 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting cross-appeal briefing schedule as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/16/2019. First cross appeal brief due 08/20/2019 for Vincent Lyle Badkin. Second brief on cross appeal due 09/20/2019 for International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District 160 and Local Lodge 282 and Lockheed Martin Corporation. Third brief on cross appeal due 10/21/2019 for Vincent Lyle Badkin. Optional cross appeal Reply brieff for Lockheed Martin Corporation is due within 21 days of service of Third brief on cross appeal. [11358570] [19-35576, 19-35524, 19-35559] (RT) [Entered: 07/09/2019 04:09 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Vincent Lyle Badkin Correspondence: Appellant's Certificate Re: Transcript and Statement of Issues on Appeal. Date of service: 07/05/2019 [11355649] [19-35524]--[COURT UPDATE: Spread docket text to 19-35559. 07/08/2019 by SLM] (Chabuk, Ahmet) [Entered: 07/05/2019 09:25 PM] |
| Filing 9 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting cross-appeal briefing schedule as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 07/09/2019. First cross appeal brief due 08/20/2019 for Vincent Lyle Badkin. Second brief on cross appeal due 09/20/2019 for International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District 160 and Local Lodge 282 and Lockheed Martin Corporation. Third brief on cross appeal due 10/21/2019 for Vincent Lyle Badkin. Optional cross appeal Reply brief for International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District 160 and Local Lodge 282 is due within 21 days of service of Third brief on cross appeal. [11352629] [19-35559, 19-35524] (RT) [Entered: 07/02/2019 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 8 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 07/01/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11351364][19-35524] (AD) [Entered: 07/01/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 07/22/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11350914] (LW) [Entered: 07/01/2019 03:19 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellee Lockheed Martin Corporation Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 07/01/2019. [11350445] [19-35524] (Byergo, Anthony) [Entered: 07/01/2019 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/28/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11349498][19-35524] (AD) [Entered: 06/29/2019 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Vincent Lyle Badkin Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/28/2019. [11349481] [19-35524] (Chabuk, Ahmet) [Entered: 06/28/2019 09:20 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/25/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11344590][19-35524] (AD) [Entered: 06/25/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellee International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District 160 and Local Lodge 282 Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/25/2019. [11344419] [19-35524] (Detwiler, Kristina) [Entered: 06/25/2019 04:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/28/2019. Appellant Vincent Lyle Badkin opening brief due 08/20/2019. Appellees International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, District 160 and Local Lodge 282 and Lockheed Martin Corporation answering brief due 09/20/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11340915] (RT) [Entered: 06/21/2019 02:37 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Vincent Badkin v. Lockheed Martin Corporation, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF MACHINISTS AND AEROSPACE WORKERS, DISTRICT 160 AND LOCAL LODGE 282, a Washington labor union | |
| Represented By: | Kristina Detwiler |
| Represented By: | Anthony Byergo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: LOCKHEED MARTIN CORPORATION, a Maryland corporation, DBA Lockheed Martin Space Systems Company | |
| Represented By: | Kristina Detwiler |
| Represented By: | Anthony Byergo |
| Represented By: | Kyle Nelson Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: VINCENT LYLE BADKIN | |
| Represented By: | Ahmet Chabuk |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
