Robert Tibbitts v. Glen Armstrong, et al
| CHAD PAGE, Warden of SICI |
| ROBERT TIBBITTS, AKA Robert Wesley Tibbitts |
| GLEN ARMSTRONG, Warden Saint Anthony, SAWC Work Camp |
| 19-35570 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER and RICHARD A. PAEZ) Appellants discovery or summary judgment (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is construed as a motion for reconsideration, and is denied. See 9th Cir. R. 27-10. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. [11406558] (JBS) [Entered: 08/22/2019 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Robert Tibbitts motion on discovery or summary judgment. Deficiencies: Case closed. Served on 08/08/2019. [11397538] (QDL) [Entered: 08/14/2019 03:47 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (SANDRA S. IKUTA and N. RANDY SMITH) On June 21, 2018, the district court granted appellants motion to voluntarily dismiss his habeas petition without prejudice, entered judgment, and declined to issue a certificate of appealability. Appellant filed a motion for permission to appeal on May 10, 2019, which the district court denied on June 25, 2019, again declining to issue a certificate of appealability. Appellant now appeals from the June 21, 2018, judgment and the June 25, 2019, order. The requests for a certificate of appealability are dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. 2107, 2253(c)(2); Sneller v. City of Bainbridge Island, 606 F.3d 636, 638 (9th Cir. 2010) (Ordinarily, a voluntary dismissal without prejudice is not an appealable final judgment.); Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1507 (9th Cir. 1995) (voluntary dismissal orders generally are not appealable). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11370862] [19-35434, 19-35570] (WL) [Entered: 07/22/2019 09:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 06/25/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11356778] (HC) [Entered: 07/08/2019 02:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
