George Buscher, et al v. Barbara Tangwall, et al
| LOIS L. BUSCHER and GEORGE E. BUSCHER |
| DONALD A. TANGWALL, and any other occupants of any portion of 11925/11901 Flyway Court, Salcha, AK and BARBARA TANGWALL |
| YUKON TITLE COMPANY, INC. |
| 19-35583 |
| July 12, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 27, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and MARK J. BENNETT) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not reviewable. See 28 U.S.C. 1447(d); Kunzi v. Pan Am. World Airways, Inc., 833 F.2d 1291, 1293 (9th Cir. 1987) (order remanding a removed action to state court for lack of subject matter jurisdiction is not reviewable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11411963] (HC) [Entered: 08/27/2019 12:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellants Barbara Tangwall and Donald A. Tangwall's motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/10/2019. [11361667] (HC) [Entered: 07/12/2019 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Barbara Tangwall and Donald A. Tangwall opening brief due 09/09/2019. Appellees George E. Buscher, Lois L. Buscher and Yukon Title Company, Inc. answering brief due 10/09/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11361646] (HC) [Entered: 07/12/2019 10:37 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
