Brenda Johnson v. Department of Social & Health, et al
DEPARTMENT OF CHILD SUPPORT, DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES and TERRY LEE REMBERT |
BRENDA M. JOHNSON |
19-35609 |
July 23, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
BRENDA JOHNSON V. DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL & HEALTH |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 28, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA and MARK J. BENNETT): Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. The briefing schedule shall proceed as follows: the opening brief is due October 18, 2019; the answering brief is due November 18, 2019; and the optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11412929] (AF) [Entered: 08/28/2019 08:38 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Brenda M. Johnson motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/26/2019. [11381588] (CW) [Entered: 07/30/2019 02:57 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11373657] (CKP) [Entered: 07/23/2019 01:17 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Brenda M. Johnson opening brief due 09/16/2019. Appellees Department of Child Support, Department of Social and Health Services and Terry Lee Rembert answering brief due 10/16/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11372830] (JBS) [Entered: 07/23/2019 09:02 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.