Robert Murphy v. Kate Brown, et al
| PATTY CRESS, Member, BPPPS, JERMIAH STROMBERG, Assistant Director of Community Corrections, Oregon Department of Corrections, LESLIE FARERRA, DAVID R. STARR, Board-Contract Psychologist, MARK SWANSON, CHRISTINE WHITE, Parole Officer, Lane County Parole-Probation Department, SID THOMPSON, Member, BPPPS, COLETTE S. PETERS, Director, Oregon Department of Corrections/ Ex Officio Member BPPS, KATE BROWN, Governor, State of Oregon, ROBERT STUCKEY, Board-Contract Psychologist, TIFFANY LOONEY, H. F. SHELLMAN, Board-Contract Psychologist, KIM MENJOU, Supervisor Lane County Parole and Probation Department, LORI LOONEY, JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-20, MICHAEL WU, Chairperson, (BPPS), KRISTIN A. WINGES-YANEZ, Chairperson, Oregon State Board of Parol and Post-Prison Supervision (BPPPS), J. SWOPE, Hearings Officer, Lane County Parole-Probation Department and CHRISTINE HERRMAN, Vice-Chairperson, BPPPS |
| ROBERT DOYLE MURPHY |
| 19-35627 |
| July 25, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Robert Doyle Murphy letter dated 07/31/2019 re: motion for IFP. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11388520] (RR) [Entered: 08/06/2019 11:20 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Robert Doyle Murphy motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/22/2019. [11378523] (QDL) [Entered: 07/26/2019 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Robert Doyle Murphy opening brief due 09/23/2019. [11376971] (JPD) [Entered: 07/25/2019 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.