Jose De la Portilla v. J. Myrick
JOSE A. DE LA PORTILLA |
J. MYRICK, Superintendent-TRCI |
19-35646 |
August 1, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 4, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jose A. De la Portilla Motion for certificate of appealability. Date of service: 09/04/2019. [11421010] [19-35646] (Loewy, Oliver) [Entered: 09/04/2019 03:08 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 07/03/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11383896] (JPD) [Entered: 08/01/2019 10:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Jose De la Portilla v. J. Myrick | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: JOSE A. DE LA PORTILLA | |
Represented By: | Oliver Winston Loewy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: J. MYRICK, Superintendent-TRCI | |
Represented By: | Lynn Larsen |
Represented By: | James Aaron |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.