George Ardizzone v. Jeff Premo
| GEORGE ARDIZZONE |
| JEFF PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary |
| 19-35704 |
| August 20, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant George Ardizzone. Date of service: 10/18/2019. [11470214] [19-35704] (Weppner, Robert) [Entered: 10/18/2019 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 9 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant George Ardizzone. Date of service: 10/18/2019. [11470202] [19-35704] (Weppner, Robert) [Entered: 10/18/2019 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 8 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Mr. Robert A. Weppner for George Ardizzone) [11421820] (DO) [Entered: 09/05/2019 10:46 AM] |
| Filing 7 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court, filed 9/4/19. [11421471] (CW) [Entered: 09/05/2019 07:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court found appellant financially eligible for appointed counsel. Appellants in forma pauperis status therefore continues in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Accordingly, the courts August 23, 2019 order directing appellant to pay the filing and docketing fees for this appeal, or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, is vacated. The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [11415649] (AF) [Entered: 08/29/2019 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 5 Attorney Samuel Abraham Kubernick substituted by Attorney Ryan P. Kahn in 19-35704. [11414225] (HH) [Entered: 08/28/2019 04:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Ryan Kahn (Oregon Department of Justice, 1162 Court St NE, Salem, OR 97301) for Appellee Jeff Premo. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Samuel Abraham Kubernick, Esquire for Appellee Jeff Premo. Date of service: 08/28/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11413408] [19-35704] (Kahn, Ryan) [Entered: 08/28/2019 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 3 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-35704: IFP] ). [11408362] (JMR) [Entered: 08/23/2019 11:18 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TSP): Order to show cause docket fee due [11408186] (TSP) [Entered: 08/23/2019 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant George Ardizzone opening brief due 10/18/2019. Appellee Jeff Premo, Superintendent answering brief due 11/18/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11403232] (JMR) [Entered: 08/20/2019 09:32 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: George Ardizzone v. Jeff Premo | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: GEORGE ARDIZZONE | |
| Represented By: | Robert A. Weppner |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: JEFF PREMO, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Abraham Kubernick Esquire |
| Represented By: | Ryan P. Kahn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
