Kannha Bounchanh v. WSHRC, et al
Defendant / Appellee: CHERYL STROBERT, JEREMY PAGE, WASHINGTON STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, AKA WSHRC, SHARON ORTIZ and IDOLINA RETA
Plaintiff / Appellant: KANNHA BOUNCHANH
Case Number: 19-35801
Filed: September 18, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 14, 2019 Filing 11 Filed Appellant Kannha Bounchanh motion for ext of time to 1/6/20. Deficiencies: No deadlines pending. Served on 11/06/2019. [11499333] (CW) [Entered: 11/14/2019 02:12 PM]
November 14, 2019 Filing 10 Filed Appellant Kannha Bounchanh amended motion to reconsider Panel order of the Court filed on 10/24/2019. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/06/2019. [11499319] (CW) [Entered: 11/14/2019 02:05 PM]
November 5, 2019 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Kannha Bounchanh motion to reconsider Panel order of the Court filed on 10/24/2019. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/31/2019. [11490508] (CW) [Entered: 11/06/2019 08:36 AM]
October 24, 2019 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Kannha Bounchanh letter dated 10/21/2019 re: to district court - addl request to motion 134, filed on 10/3/19. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11479824] (CW) [Entered: 10/28/2019 12:21 PM]
October 24, 2019 Filing 7 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); see also Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11476832] (AF) [Entered: 10/24/2019 02:42 PM]
October 15, 2019 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Kannha Bounchanh letter dated 10/10/2019 re: statements regarding transmittal of the record, list of additional evidence. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11465428] (CW) [Entered: 10/16/2019 09:03 AM]
October 3, 2019 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Kannha Bounchanh motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/27/2019. [11453868] (CW) [Entered: 10/04/2019 06:55 AM]
October 3, 2019 Filing 4 Received original and 7 copies of Appellant Kannha Bounchanh opening brief (Informal: Yes) of 14 pages. Served on 09/30/2019. Major deficiencies: briefing stayed (IFP motion pending). [11453678] (LA) [Entered: 10/03/2019 04:40 PM]
September 30, 2019 Filing 3 Filed Appellant Kannha Bounchanh letter dated 09/23/2019 re: copies of misc forms, docs, receipts. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11449524] (CW) [Entered: 10/01/2019 08:32 AM]
September 18, 2019 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Kannha Bounchanh motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/12/2019. [11436101] (JBS) [Entered: 09/18/2019 02:26 PM]
September 18, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kannha Bounchanh opening brief due 11/12/2019. Appellees Sharon Ortiz, Jeremy Page, Idolina Reta, Cheryl Strobert and Washington State Human Rights Commission answering brief due 12/12/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11436094] (JBS) [Entered: 09/18/2019 02:24 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kannha Bounchanh v. WSHRC, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHERYL STROBERT
Represented By: Celeste Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JEREMY PAGE
Represented By: Celeste Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WASHINGTON STATE HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION, AKA WSHRC
Represented By: Celeste Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SHARON ORTIZ
Represented By: Celeste Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: IDOLINA RETA
Represented By: Celeste Stokes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KANNHA BOUNCHANH
Represented By: Kannha Bounchanh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?