Timothy Rote v. Linda Marshall, et al
JANE DOE, JOEL W. CHRISTIANSEN, LINDA L. MARSHALL, OREGON STATE BAR, Professional Liability Fund, JOHN DOES, (4-5), ANDREW C. BRANDSNESS, MATTHEW KALMANSON, PAMELA J. STENDAHL and CAROL J. BERNICK |
TIMOTHY C. ROTE |
19-35847 |
October 7, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Streamlined request [2] by Appellant Timothy C. Rote to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Timothy C. Rote opening brief due 01/02/2020. Appellees Carol J. Bernick, Andrew C. Brandsness, Joel W. Christiansen, Jane Doe, John Does, Matthew Kalmanson, Linda L. Marshall, Oregon State Bar and Pamela J. Stendahl answering brief due 02/03/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11516786] (JN) [Entered: 12/02/2019 09:06 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Timothy C. Rote. New requested due date is 01/02/2020. [11516596] [19-35847] (Rote, Timothy) [Entered: 12/01/2019 02:01 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Timothy C. Rote opening brief due 12/03/2019. Appellees Carol J. Bernick, Andrew C. Brandsness, Joel W. Christiansen, Jane Doe, John Does, Matthew Kalmanson, Linda L. Marshall, Oregon State Bar and Pamela J. Stendahl answering brief due 01/03/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11455819] (RT) [Entered: 10/07/2019 10:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.