Albert Veenstra, III v. University of Idaho Law School, et al
| TRUDY H. FOUSER, Idaho State Bar Governing Member, sued in her personal and professional capacity, UNNAMED FACULTY MEMBERS, sued in their personal and professional capacities, DENNIS S. VORHEES, Idaho State Bar Governing Member, sued in his personal and professional capacity, UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO LAW SCHOOL, sued in its official capacity, CHUCK STABEN, University of Idaho School President, sued in his personal and professional capacitie, IDAHO STATE BAR, sued in its official capacity, TIM GRESBACK, Idaho State Bar Governing Member, sued in his personal and professional capacity, MICHELLE R. POINTS, Idaho State Bar Governing Member, sued in her personal and professional capacity, PAUL B. RIPPLE, Idaho State Bar Governing Member, sued in his personal and professional capacity and NUMEROUS ATTORNEYS, All unnamed licensed by the Idaho State Bar sued in their personal and professional capacities who served as officers of the court between and |
| ALBERT PETE VEENSTRA III |
| 19-35851 |
| October 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Granting Motion to dismiss the case pursuant to rule 42b filed by Appellant Albert Pete Veenstra, III. This order shall constitute the mandate. [11481814] (CKP) [Entered: 10/29/2019 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Albert Pete Veenstra, III motion to voluntarily dismiss appeal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/22/2019. [11477201] (RL) [Entered: 10/24/2019 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): Appellant has filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court denied appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis because it found that the action was frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. All pending motions will be addressed after appellant complies with this order. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [11466696] (CKP) [Entered: 10/16/2019 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [11465755] (OC) [Entered: 10/16/2019 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 6 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Albert Pete Veenstra, III opening brief (Informal: Yes) 4 pages. Served on 10/02/2019. Major deficiencies: motions pending. [11461664] (SML) [Entered: 10/11/2019 10:11 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Albert Pete Veenstra, III addendum to motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Dated 10/03/2019. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11460046] (RL) [Entered: 10/09/2019 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Albert Pete Veenstra, III motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis on appeal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/02/2019. [11459476] (RL) [Entered: 10/09/2019 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 3 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-35851: Due] ). [11459354] (JW) [Entered: 10/09/2019 12:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Albert Pete Veenstra, III motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/02/2019. [11458496] (RT) [Entered: 10/08/2019 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Albert Pete Veenstra III opening brief due 12/06/2019. [11458475] (RT) [Entered: 10/08/2019 04:07 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Albert Veenstra, III v. University of Idaho Law School, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: TRUDY H. FOUSER, Idaho State Bar Governing Member, sued in her personal and professional capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNNAMED FACULTY MEMBERS, sued in their personal and professional capacities | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DENNIS S. VORHEES, Idaho State Bar Governing Member, sued in his personal and professional capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNIVERSITY OF IDAHO LAW SCHOOL, sued in its official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: CHUCK STABEN, University of Idaho School President, sued in his personal and professional capacitie | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: IDAHO STATE BAR, sued in its official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: TIM GRESBACK, Idaho State Bar Governing Member, sued in his personal and professional capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MICHELLE R. POINTS, Idaho State Bar Governing Member, sued in her personal and professional capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: PAUL B. RIPPLE, Idaho State Bar Governing Member, sued in his personal and professional capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: NUMEROUS ATTORNEYS, All unnamed licensed by the Idaho State Bar sued in their personal and professional capacities who served as officers of the court between and | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: ALBERT PETE VEENSTRA III | |
| Represented By: | Albert Pete Veenstra III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
