Armando Balderas, Jr., et al v. UPS
| UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., An Ohio corporation |
| WILLIAM SCOBBY, DUSTIN HORN, JON RANSOM, ARMANDO BALDERAS, Jr., JAY BARTOLOME, CODY TENNANT and OCTAVIO GONZALEZ |
| 19-35964 |
| November 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 02/11/2020, 10:30 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [11557738] (CL) [Entered: 01/10/2020 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 01/09/2020, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11537766] (CL) [Entered: 12/18/2019 04:45 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 12/16/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11518158] (CL) [Entered: 12/02/2019 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/25/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11512183]. [19-35964] (AD) [Entered: 11/25/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/25/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11512182]. [19-35964] (AD) [Entered: 11/25/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellants Cody Tennant, William Scobby, Jon Ransom, Dustin Horn, Octavio Gonzalez, Jay Bartolome and Armando Balderas, Jr. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/25/2019. [11511876] [19-35964] (Nicholson, Chad) [Entered: 11/25/2019 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellee UPS Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/25/2019. [11511710] [19-35964] (Salmi, Christine) [Entered: 11/25/2019 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Armando Balderas Jr., Jay Bartolome, Octavio Gonzalez, Dustin Horn, Jon Ransom, William Scobby and Cody Tennant Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/25/2019. Transcript ordered by 12/18/2019. Transcript due 01/17/2020. Appellants Armando Balderas Jr., Jay Bartolome, Octavio Gonzalez, Dustin Horn, Jon Ransom, William Scobby and Cody Tennant opening brief due 02/26/2020. Appellee United Parcel Service, Inc. answering brief due 03/27/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11502788] (JBS) [Entered: 11/18/2019 03:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
