Dale Shackelford v. Jay Christensen
| DALE C. SHACKELFORD |
| RANDY BLADES, Warden and JAY CHRISTENSEN, Warden |
| 19-35968 |
| November 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Dale C. Shackelford motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/11/2019. [11535736] (QDL) [Entered: 12/17/2019 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Dale C. Shackelford motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/11/2019. [11535728] (QDL) [Entered: 12/17/2019 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 6 Sent Appellant a copy of forms ( 1 ) and ( 4 ) in response to his letter of request filed on 12/02/2019. [11525696] (JR) [Entered: 12/09/2019 01:37 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Dale C. Shackelford letter dated 11/25/2019 re: Request for appeal forms. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11519544] (QDL) [Entered: 12/03/2019 02:03 PM] |
| Filing 4 Appellee Randy Blades in 19-35968 substituted by Appellee Jay Christensen in 19-35968 [11510273] (SLM) [Entered: 11/25/2019 08:29 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Dale C. Shackelford motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/18/2019. [11509683] (QDL) [Entered: 11/22/2019 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court filed on 11/22/2019. [11509678] (QDL) [Entered: 11/22/2019 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 11/01/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11503930] (JMR) [Entered: 11/19/2019 11:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
