Inge Anderson v. Scott Anderson, et al
| UNITED STATES AIR FORCE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| INGE T. ANDERSON |
| SCOTT ALAN ANDERSON |
| 19-36000 |
| December 2, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Streamlined request [3] by Appellant Inge T. Anderson to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Inge T. Anderson opening brief due 03/04/2020. Appellee Scott Alan Anderson answering brief due 04/03/2020. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11568489] (DLM) [Entered: 01/21/2020 01:48 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Inge T. Anderson. New requested due date is 03/03/2020. [11567198] [19-36000] (Messplay, Stephanie) [Entered: 01/20/2020 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Stephanie L. Messplay (Van Siclen, Stocks & Firkins, 721 45th St NE, Auburn, WA 98002) for Appellant Inge T. Anderson. Substitution for Party Inge T. Anderson. Date of service: 12/03/2019. (Party was previously proceeding pro se.) [11519966] [19-36000] (Messplay, Stephanie) [Entered: 12/03/2019 04:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Inge T. Anderson opening brief due 02/03/2020. Appellee Scott Alan Anderson answering brief due 03/03/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11518234] (RT) [Entered: 12/02/2019 04:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
