Marco Santiago v. Bruce Gage, et al
| WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| MARCO A. SANTIAGO |
| RYAN HARRINGTON, Sued in his individual and official capacity, BRUCE C. GAGE, Sued in his individual and official capacity and SCOTT LIGHT, Sued in his individual and official capacity |
| 19-36019 |
| December 4, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 21, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Received original and 7 copies of Appellant Marco A. Santiago opening brief (Informal: No) 6 pages. Served on 01/14/2020. Major deficiencies: opening brief already received, motions pending. Notified appellant. [11571380] (KT) [Entered: 01/23/2020 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Marco A. Santiago motion to appoint counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/07/2020. [11569377] (CW) [Entered: 01/22/2020 07:52 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Marco A. Santiago motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/05/2019. [11534980] (CW) [Entered: 12/17/2019 10:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Marco A. Santiago opening brief (Informal: Yes) of 6 pages. Served on 12/12/2019. Major deficiencies: case is stayed. [11534219] (LA) [Entered: 12/16/2019 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The courts records reflect that the notice of appeal was filed during the pendency of a timely-filed motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), and that motion is still pending in the district court. The December 3, 2019 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending December 3, 2019 motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellant shall file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellant intends to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellant must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk shall serve this order on the district court. [11526203] (CKP) [Entered: 12/09/2019 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Marco A. Santiago opening brief due 02/03/2020. Appellees Bruce C. Gage, Ryan Harrington and Scott Light answering brief due 03/02/2020. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11521342] (HC) [Entered: 12/04/2019 03:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
