Amador Mendoza v. J. Salazar
AMADOR SANCHEZ MENDOZA |
J. SALAZAR |
19-36030 |
December 6, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Amador Sanchez Mendoza motion for reconsideration, clarification and modification as to whether a coa is necessary and if so a request for an extension of time as well as appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/26/2019. [11549545] (RR) [Entered: 01/02/2020 04:33 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 09/24/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11523399] (JMR) [Entered: 12/06/2019 09:18 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Amador Mendoza v. J. Salazar | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: AMADOR SANCHEZ MENDOZA | |
Represented By: | Amador Sanchez Mendoza |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: J. SALAZAR | |
Represented By: | Amy Potter |
Represented By: | Kelly A. Zusman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.