USA v. Dongyuan Li
| DONGYUAN LI |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-50132 |
| April 19, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 Filed order (EDWARD LEAVY, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and CARLOS T. BEA) This is an appeal from the district courts pretrial detention order. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3145(c) and 28 U.S.C. 1291. We review the district courts factual findings concerning risk of flight under a deferential, clearly erroneous standard. United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 994 (9th Cir. 1990). The conclusions based on such factual findings, however, present a mixed question of fact and law. Id. Thus, the question of whether the district courts factual determinations justify the pretrial detention order is reviewed de novo. United States v. Hir, 517 F.3d 1081, 1086-87 (9th Cir. 2008) (citations omitted). The district court correctly found that the government has met its burden of showing, by a preponderance of the evidence, that no condition or combination of conditions will reasonably assure the [defendants] appearance, 18 U.S.C. KWH/MOATT 2 19-50132 3142(e), and that appellant therefore poses a risk of flight. See United States v. Motamedi, 767 F.2d 1403, 1406 (9th Cir. 1985). We therefore affirm the district courts pretrial detention order. Appellants request for judicial notice (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) and unopposed motion to file an oversized Rule 9(a) memorandum (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) are granted. AFFIRMED. [11312147] (WL) [Entered: 05/29/2019 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dongyuan Li reply to response to FRAP 9(a) memorandum. Date of service: 05/15/2019. [11299269] [19-50132] (Carroll, David) [Entered: 05/15/2019 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee USA response to FRAP 9(a) memorandum. Date of service: 05/09/2019. [11292491] [19-50132]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 05/09/2019 by SLM] (Pell, Charles) [Entered: 05/09/2019 02:55 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dongyuan Li Unopposed Motion to file oversized brief. Date of service: 05/03/2019. [11286463] [19-50132] (Carroll, David) [Entered: 05/03/2019 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dongyuan Li Motion to take judicial notice of Facts and Documents in Support of Appellant's Memorandum of Law and Facts. Date of service: 05/03/2019. [11286455] [19-50132] (Carroll, David) [Entered: 05/03/2019 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 5 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 4 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Dongyuan Li. Date of service: 05/03/2019. [11286429] [19-50132] (Carroll, David) [Entered: 05/03/2019 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dongyuan Li FRAP 9(a) memorandum. Date of service: 05/03/2019. [11286416] [19-50132] --[COURT UPDATE: Attached exhibits. 5/3/2019 by TYL] (Carroll, David) [Entered: 05/03/2019 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added attorney David J. Carroll for Dongyuan Li, in case 19-50132. [11275074] (RR) [Entered: 04/24/2019 10:40 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of David J. Carroll for Appellant Dongyuan Li. Date of service: 04/22/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11272661] [19-50132] (Carroll, David) [Entered: 04/22/2019 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Memorandum/Motion re: 9th Circuit Rule 9-1.1(a) due 05/03/2019 for Appellant Dongyuan Li. The Response shall be filed within 10 days of service of the 9a Memo/Motion. The Optional Reply may be filed within 7 days of service of the Response. See 9th Cir. R. 9-1.1. Contacted counsel re: Informed of rule & time limits & docket number. [11270497] (JPD) [Entered: 04/19/2019 01:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Dongyuan Li | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: DONGYUAN LI | |
| Represented By: | David J. Carroll |
| Represented By: | Thomas Peter O'Brien |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | L. Ashley Aull |
| Represented By: | Charles E. Pell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
