USA v. Mary Bridges
MARY M. BRIDGES |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
19-50157 |
May 14, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: Affirming conviction/$40 fine. Transcript ordered by 06/03/2019. Transcript due 07/03/2019. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 08/12/2019 for Mary M. Bridges. Appellee brief due 09/11/2019 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11296396] (HC) [Entered: 05/14/2019 10:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: USA v. Mary Bridges | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: MARY M. BRIDGES | |
Represented By: | James H. Locklin Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | L. Ashley Aull |
Represented By: | Julia S. Choe |
Represented By: | Sharon K. McCaslin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.