USA v. Dominic Dorsey
| DOMINIC DORSEY, AKA Boo, AKA Boogaloo, AKA Dominic Cavanaughn Dorsey |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-50182 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
|
|
| USA V. DOMINIC DORSEY |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DV): A review of this courts docket reflects that the filing and docketing fees for this appeal remain due. Within 14 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay to the district court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal and file in this court proof of such payment or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Failure to pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis may result in the dismissal of the appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk shall serve a Form CJA 23 on appellant. [11324781] (HC) [Entered: 06/10/2019 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-50182: Due] ). [11324284] (DJV) [Entered: 06/10/2019 07:32 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. Reporters Transcript required: Yes. Sentence imposed: 40 Years and 1 Day. Transcript ordered by 06/28/2019. Transcript due 07/29/2019. Appellant briefs and excerpts due by 09/06/2019 for Dominic Dorsey. Appellee brief due 10/07/2019 for United States of America. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11323795] (JPD) [Entered: 06/07/2019 03:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.