USA v. Gilbert Michaels
| GILBERT GIL N. MICHAELS |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 19-50379 |
| December 23, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Paul S. Meyer for party(s) Appellant Gilbert Gil N. Michaels, in case 19-50379. [11544368] (QDL) [Entered: 12/26/2019 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Paul S. Meyer (Paul S. Meyer, A Professional Corporation, 695 Town Center Drive, Suite 875, Costa Mesa, California 92626) for Appellant Gilbert Gil N. Michaels. Date of service: 12/26/2019. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [11544343] [19-50379] (Meyer, Paul) [Entered: 12/26/2019 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Gilbert Gil N. Michaels FRAP 9(a) memorandum. Date of service: 12/26/2019. [11544216]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [2].] (SLM) [Entered: 12/26/2019 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 2 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 3 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellant Gilbert Gil N. Michaels Motion for bail pending Appeal. Date of service: 12/26/2019. [11544161] [19-50379] (Levine, Joel) [Entered: 12/26/2019 11:16 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. The Response shall be filed within 10 days of service of the 9a Memo/Motion. The Optional Reply may be filed within 7 days of service of the Response. See 9th Cir. R. 9-1.1. Contacted counsel re: Informed of rule & time limits & docket number. [11541686] (JPD) [Entered: 12/23/2019 10:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
