Richard Owens, Jr. v. Christian Pfeiffer
| CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden |
| RICHARD OWENS, Jr. |
| 19-55124 |
| January 29, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 29, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Case terminated, opened in error. See Order on 1/25/19 in Case No. 18-56418) [11171019] (BY) [Entered: 01/29/2019 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 07/03/2018. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11170800] (JMR) [Entered: 01/29/2019 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Richard Owens, Jr. v. Christian Pfeiffer | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: CHRISTIAN PFEIFFER, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Stephanie Chu Santoro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: RICHARD OWENS, Jr. | |
| Represented By: | Richard Owens Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
