Victor Arzate v. Los Angeles County Sheriff's D, et al
| MILLER, Lt. and ROMO, Sergeant |
| LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CINCEROS, Deputy and LOPEZ, Deputy |
| VICTOR ARZATE |
| 19-55145 |
| February 5, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: CKP) Motion to dismiss case for failure to prosecute (Cir. Rule 42-1). Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 02/11/2019). This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [11227862] (CKP) [Entered: 03/14/2019 12:47 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Victor Arzate letter dated re: case information. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11203470] (JFF) [Entered: 02/21/2019 04:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Victor Arzate motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 02/12/2019. [11198940] (JFF) [Entered: 02/19/2019 11:03 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Victor Arzate letter dated re: case information. Paper filing deficiency: None. [11196000] (JFF) [Entered: 02/15/2019 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The district courts post-judgment order was entered on the docket on December 21, 2018. Appellants notice of appeal was filed in the district court on February 4, 2019. Accordingly, the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after entry of the district courts order. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(c); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal, or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk shall dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [11185640] (CKP) [Entered: 02/11/2019 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Victor Arzate opening brief due 04/05/2019. [11179890] (JPD) [Entered: 02/05/2019 02:02 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
