Lewellyn Cox, IV v. USA, et al
Defendant: JOSEPH T. MCNALLY
Petitioner: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and POMONA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Defendant / Appellee: JAMES MIKKELSON, Secret Service Agent, CURT CASLER, Sheriff Detective, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and WESLEY SCHWARK, Secret Service Agent
Plaintiff / Appellant: LEWELLYN CHARLES COX IV, AKA Sho, AKA Showtime, AKA Showtyme
Case Number: 19-55170
Filed: February 11, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 8, 2019 Filing 9 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Lewellyn Charles Cox, IV opening brief (Informal: No) 7 pages. Served on 04/04/2019. Major deficiencies: motion pending. [11257928] (KWG) [Entered: 04/09/2019 01:11 PM]
March 12, 2019 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Lewellyn Charles Cox, IV motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/06/2019. [11224843] (QDL) [Entered: 03/12/2019 02:16 PM]
March 5, 2019 Filing 7 Attorney Daniel Beck in 19-55170 substituted by Attorney Timothy Biche in 19-55170 [11216912] (QDL) [Entered: 03/05/2019 02:42 PM]
March 5, 2019 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Timothy D. Biche for Appellees USA, James Mikkelson, Wesley Schwark and Curt Casler. Substitution for Attorney Daniel Beck for Appellees Curt Casler, James Mikkelson, Wesley Schwark and USA. Date of service: 03/05/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11216883] [19-55170] (Biche, Timothy) [Entered: 03/05/2019 02:36 PM]
March 1, 2019 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has denied appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [11212826] (CKP) [Entered: 03/01/2019 11:18 AM]
February 26, 2019 Filing 4 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 19-55170: Due] ). [11207873] (CO) [Entered: 02/26/2019 11:35 AM]
February 25, 2019 Filing 3 Received copy of District Court order filed on 02/25/2019 recommending denial of in forma pauperis status on appeal. [11206580] (QDL) [Entered: 02/25/2019 02:51 PM]
February 13, 2019 Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11188827] (CKP) [Entered: 02/13/2019 12:09 PM]
February 11, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Lewellyn Charles Cox IV opening brief due 04/08/2019. Appellees Curt Casler, James Mikkelson, Wesley Schwark and United States of America answering brief due 05/08/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11185170] (RT) [Entered: 02/11/2019 09:57 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lewellyn Cox, IV v. USA, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JAMES MIKKELSON, Secret Service Agent
Represented By: Daniel Beck
Represented By: Marcus Kerner
Represented By: Keith Miles Staub
Represented By: Timothy Biche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CURT CASLER, Sheriff Detective
Represented By: Daniel Beck
Represented By: Marcus Kerner
Represented By: Keith Miles Staub
Represented By: Timothy Biche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Daniel Beck
Represented By: Marcus Kerner
Represented By: Keith Miles Staub
Represented By: Timothy Biche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WESLEY SCHWARK, Secret Service Agent
Represented By: Daniel Beck
Represented By: Marcus Kerner
Represented By: Keith Miles Staub
Represented By: Timothy Biche
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LEWELLYN CHARLES COX IV, AKA Sho, AKA Showtime, AKA Showtyme
Represented By: Lewellyn Charles Cox IV
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: POMONA POLICE DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSEPH T. MCNALLY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?