Roscoe Chambers v. Poyner, et al
Defendant: FCI DOCTOR, ALLEN, HARDY, Senior Deputy and K. SCHNEIDER
Defendant / Appellee: JOSE ESQUETINI, LEEN, POYNER, USP Health Administrator, FRANKLIN RUTLEDGE, MD and DAVID SHINN, Warden
Plaintiff / Appellant: ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Case Number: 19-55280
Filed: March 12, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 22, 2020 ROSCOE CHAMBERS V. POYNER

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 26, 2019 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Roscoe Chambers motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief for 30 days. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/22/2019. [11279006] (QDL) [Entered: 04/26/2019 02:06 PM]
April 8, 2019 Filing 7 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Roscoe Chambers (Informal: No) opening brief of 21 pages. Served on 03/25/2019. [11258394] (GV) [Entered: 04/09/2019 03:48 PM]
April 8, 2019 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Roscoe Chambers letter dated 04/04/2019 re: request for confirmation of receipt of motion and brief. Paper filing deficiency: None. (Sent appellant copy of docket sheet) [11258297] (QDL) [Entered: 04/09/2019 03:05 PM]
April 5, 2019 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Roscoe Chambers motion to request discovery. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/01/2019. [11254842] (QDL) [Entered: 04/05/2019 02:58 PM]
March 27, 2019 Filing 4 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11243633] (CKP) [Entered: 03/27/2019 11:08 AM]
March 25, 2019 Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 03/19/2019. [Case Number 19-55280: Partially Paid] [11241374] (QDL) [Entered: 03/25/2019 03:10 PM]
March 14, 2019 Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11227819] (CKP) [Entered: 03/14/2019 12:22 PM]
March 12, 2019 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Roscoe Chambers opening brief due 04/30/2019. Appellees Jose Esquetini, Leen, Poyner, Franklin Rutledge and David Shinn, Warden answering brief due 05/30/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11224024] (JPD) [Entered: 03/12/2019 09:06 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Roscoe Chambers v. Poyner, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: FCI DOCTOR
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ALLEN
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HARDY, Senior Deputy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: K. SCHNEIDER
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOSE ESQUETINI
Represented By: Tim Laske Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LEEN
Represented By: Tim Laske Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: POYNER, USP Health Administrator
Represented By: Tim Laske Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FRANKLIN RUTLEDGE, MD
Represented By: Tim Laske Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID SHINN, Warden
Represented By: Tim Laske Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ROSCOE CHAMBERS
Represented By: Roscoe Chambers
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?