Jose Hernandez v. Neil McDowell
Petitioner / Appellant: JOSE REDANI HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee: NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Case Number: 19-55287
Filed: March 13, 2019
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 16, 2019 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Jose Redani Hernandez motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/09/2019. [11265970] (NAC) [Entered: 04/16/2019 02:40 PM]
March 13, 2019 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 02/21/2019. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11225948] (OC) [Entered: 03/13/2019 11:43 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jose Hernandez v. Neil McDowell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: JOSE REDANI HERNANDEZ
Represented By: Jose Redani Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: NEIL MCDOWELL, Warden
Represented By: Kenneth Charles Byrne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?