Jose Fernandez, et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
ALEX YONG, JOSHUA BOSWELL, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated and JOSE FERNANDEZ |
BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. |
19-55326 |
March 21, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 25, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 05/21/2019, 1:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11277626] (BS) [Entered: 04/25/2019 03:04 PM] |
Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 04/19/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11252604] (VS) [Entered: 04/04/2019 09:09 AM] |
Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/29/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11247335] (AD) [Entered: 03/29/2019 06:44 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellants Joshua Boswell, Jose Fernandez and Alex Yong Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/29/2019. [11247041] [19-55326] (Buck, Joshua) [Entered: 03/29/2019 03:11 PM] |
Filing 4 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 03/29/2019. [11246846] (BY) [Entered: 03/29/2019 02:01 PM] |
Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellants have filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellants shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [11246667] (LW) [Entered: 03/29/2019 12:15 PM] |
Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/28/2019. Transcript ordered by 04/22/2019. Transcript due 05/20/2019. Appellants Joshua Boswell, Jose Fernandez and Alex Yong opening brief due 07/01/2019. Appellee Bank of America, N.A. answering brief due 08/01/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11237877] (RT) [Entered: 03/21/2019 02:33 PM] |
Filing 1 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN and MARY H. MURGUIA, Circuit Judges) in case no. 18-80187 on 3-21-2019: The court, in its discretion, grants the petition for permission to appeal the district courts order denying class action certification. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(f); Chamberlan v. Ford Motor Co., 402 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 2005). Within 14 days after the date of this order, petitioners shall perfect the appeal in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d). All pending motions concerning holding proceedings in abeyance (Docket Entries No. 4 & 5) are denied as moot. [11237871] (RT) [Entered: 03/21/2019 02:32 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.