Raymond Myers v. Daniel Paramo, et al
| DANIEL PARAMO, Warden and A. MILLER, Warden |
| RAYMOND DEAN MYERS |
| R. ARIAS, Captain of D-Yard and ARLITA BASTO, Registered Dietician |
| 19-55390 |
| April 8, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 15, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (DFO, WAF and PJW) [11297750] (NAC) [Entered: 05/15/2019 07:36 AM] |
| Filing 3 Streamlined request by Appellant Raymond Dean Myers to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The case is closed. See [Docket 2] [11285399] (DLM) [Entered: 05/02/2019 05:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN, WILLIAM A. FLETCHER and PAUL J. WATFORD): A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order is not appealable unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or judgment is entered in compliance with rule); see also Religious Tech. Ctr. v. Scott, 869 F.2d 1306 (9th Cir. 1989) (denial of temporary restraining order is appealable only if the denial is tantamount to the denial of a preliminary injunction); Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [11274124] (RT) [Entered: 04/23/2019 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Raymond Dean Myers opening brief due 05/28/2019. Appellees R. Arias and Arlita Basto answering brief due 06/25/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11255630] (JMR) [Entered: 04/08/2019 09:52 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
