Darnell Black, Sr. v. Tiggs Brown
| TIGGS BROWN, Doctor, individual and official capacity |
| DARNELL BLACK, Sr. |
| 19-55472 |
| April 26, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Darnell Black, Sr. motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/02/2019. [11291979] (QDL) [Entered: 05/09/2019 11:05 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEE. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Darnell Black Sr. opening brief due 06/14/2019. [11278235] (JMR) [Entered: 04/26/2019 09:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Darnell Black, Sr. v. Tiggs Brown | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: TIGGS BROWN, Doctor, individual and official capacity | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DARNELL BLACK, Sr. | |
| Represented By: | Darnell Black Sr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
