Primacy Engineering, Inc. v. ITE, Inc., et al
CHRISTIAN S. BROWN, an individual and ISPA TECHNOLOGY, LLC, a Virginia Limited Liability Company |
ITE, INC., a Virginia Corporation and TED RAITCH, an individual |
PRIMACY ENGINEERING, INC., a New Jersey Corporation |
19-55534 |
May 9, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Filed order MEDIATION (JW): The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: appellant shall file an opening brief on or before September 6, 2019; appellees shall file an answering brief on or before October 7, 2019; appellant may file an optional reply brief within twenty one (21) days from the service date of the answering brief. A dial-in telephonic conference with counsel for appellant only will be held on July 3, 2019, at 1:30 p.m. Pacific Time. Counsel for appellant will receive an email with dial-in information. Please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov if counsel does not receive an email or if additional participants should be added.[11336740] (WL) [Entered: 06/19/2019 09:09 AM] |
Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 06/10/2019, 10:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11312727] (BS) [Entered: 05/29/2019 05:35 PM] |
Filing 7 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/16/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11300820] (AD) [Entered: 05/16/2019 06:44 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellees ITE, Inc. and Ted Raitch Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/16/2019. [11300648] [19-55534] (McIntyre, Lann) [Entered: 05/16/2019 04:19 PM] |
Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 05/15/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11299413] (AD) [Entered: 05/15/2019 06:44 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Primacy Engineering, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 05/15/2019. [11299270] [19-55534] (Gessin, Jesse) [Entered: 05/15/2019 04:33 PM] |
Filing 3 Added attorney Lann G. McIntyre for ITE, Inc. Ted Raitch, in case 19-55534. [11293176] (JFF) [Entered: 05/10/2019 10:37 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Lann G. McIntyre for Appellees ITE, Inc. and Ted Raitch. Date of service: 05/09/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11292803] [19-55534] (McIntyre, Lann) [Entered: 05/09/2019 05:15 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/16/2019. Appellant Primacy Engineering, Inc. opening brief due 07/08/2019. Appellees ITE, Inc. and Ted Raitch answering brief due 08/07/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11292560] (JBS) [Entered: 05/09/2019 03:24 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.