David Turner, Jr. v. County of San Diego, et al
| COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, CITY OF SAN DIEGO, M.T.S., CITY OF EL CAJON, FOOD4LESS and SAN DIEGO TROLLEY |
| DAVID B. TURNER, Jr. |
| 19-55570 |
| May 17, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 2, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail returned on 06/26/2019 addressed to David B. Turner, Jr., re: 05/17/2019 case opening letter [ # 1 ]. Returned envelope notes: return to sender, attempted - not known, unable to forward. Resending to: case files; no forwarding address found. [11352928] (LA) [Entered: 07/02/2019 06:41 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (RICHARD R. CLIFTON, N. RANDY SMITH and MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the May 16, 2019 notice of appeal was not filed within 30 days after the district court's judgment entered on April 5, 2019. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); United States v. Sadler, 480 F.3d 932, 937 (9th Cir. 2007) (requirement of timely notice of appeal is jurisdictional). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [11344982] (JBS) [Entered: 06/26/2019 10:42 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant David B. Turner, Jr. motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/16/2019. [11301832] (JBS) [Entered: 05/17/2019 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant David B. Turner Jr. opening brief due 07/15/2019. [11301828] (JBS) [Entered: 05/17/2019 03:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
