Jay Potter v. Cross Country Mortgage, Inc., et al
RUBIN LUBLIN, TN, PLLC, HENRY COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NATIONSTAR MORTGAGE LLC, DBA Mr. Cooper, JOHN OR JANE DOES, any to be added and CROSS COUNTRY MORTGAGE, INC. |
JAY ELLIS POTTER |
19-55597 |
May 24, 2019 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
JAY POTTER V. CROSS COUNTRY MORTGAGE, INC. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 22, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Jay Ellis Potter. Date of service: 07/22/2019. [11371613] [19-55597] (Potter, Jay) [Entered: 07/22/2019 01:03 PM] |
Filing 8 Sent document.: Copy of court's 7-18-2019 order - sent to: Cross Country Mortgage, Inc. at: 1 Corporate Dr., Lake Zurich, IL 60047. [11368811] (RT) [Entered: 07/18/2019 04:52 PM] |
Filing 7 Terminated Priscilla Szeto for Cross Country Mortgage, Inc. in 19-55597 [11368806] (RT) [Entered: 07/18/2019 04:50 PM] |
Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LKK): The motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) of Priscilla Szeto, Esq. and Reed Smith LLP to withdraw as counsel of record for appellee Cross Country Mortgage, Inc. is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect that Priscilla Szeto, Esq. and Reed Smith LLP are no longer counsel of record for Cross Country Mortgage, Inc. A corporation must be represented by counsel to appear in this court. 0See D-Beam Ltd. Partnership v. Roller Derby Skates, Inc., 366 F.3d 972 (9th Cir. 2004). Within 28 days after the date of this order, Cross Country Mortgage, Inc.s new counsel shall file a notice of appearance with the court. If Cross Country Mortgage, Inc. fails to comply with this order, Cross Country Mortgage, Inc. will not be heard at oral argument unless the court grants permission. See Fed. R. App. P. 31(c). The Clerk will provide a copy of this order to Cross Country Mortgage, Inc. at: 1 Corporate Dr., Lake Zurich, IL 60047. [11368797] (RT) [Entered: 07/18/2019 04:47 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees Cross Country Mortgage, Inc. and Nationstar Mortgage LLC motion. Attorney(s) Attorney Priscilla Szeto for Appellees Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Cross Country Mortgage, Inc. motion to withdraw as counsel. Date of service: 06/20/2019. [11339619] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [4] .] (TYL) [Entered: 06/20/2019 03:11 PM] |
Filing 4 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 5 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellee Nationstar Mortgage LLC Correspondence: Motion for Permission To Withdraw as Attorney of Record for Cross Country, Inc. Only. Date of service: 06/20/2019 [11339396] [19-55597] (Szeto, Priscilla) [Entered: 06/20/2019 02:02 PM] |
Filing 3 Added attorney Priscilla Szeto for Cross Country Mortgage, Inc. Nationstar Mortgage LLC, in case 19-55597. [11335806] (NAC) [Entered: 06/18/2019 01:21 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Priscilla Szeto for Appellees Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Cross Country Mortgage, Inc.. Date of service: 06/18/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11335799] [19-55597] (Szeto, Priscilla) [Entered: 06/18/2019 01:19 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jay Ellis Potter opening brief due 07/22/2019. Appellees Cross Country Mortgage, Inc., Henry County Sheriff's Office, John or Jane Does, Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Rubin Lublin, TN, PLLC answering brief due 08/21/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11308990] (JPD) [Entered: 05/24/2019 02:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.