Raul Caiz v. William Roberts, II, et al
| DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive, MAYBACH MUSIC GROUP, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company, WILLIAM LEONARD ROBERTS II, an individual, AKA Mastermind, AKA Rick Ross, UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a California Corporation and DEF JAM RECORDS, INC., Delaware Corporation |
| RAUL CAIZ, individually |
| 19-55611 |
| May 28, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11366504] (BS) [Entered: 07/17/2019 12:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 Streamlined request [5] by Appellant Raul Caiz to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamline requests allow for 30 day extensions. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Raul Caiz opening brief due 08/26/2019. Appellees Def Jam Records, Inc., Does, Maybach Music Group, LLC, William Leonard Roberts II and Universal Music Group, Inc. answering brief due 09/25/2019. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [11359716] (DLM) [Entered: 07/10/2019 03:23 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Raul Caiz. New requested due date is 08/23/2019. [11359264] [19-55611] (Demirjian, Kris) [Entered: 07/10/2019 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 07/15/2019, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [11339792] (BS) [Entered: 06/20/2019 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/04/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11319171] (AD) [Entered: 06/04/2019 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Raul Caiz Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/04/2019. [11318998] [19-55611] (Demirjian, Kris) [Entered: 06/04/2019 11:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/04/2019. Appellant Raul Caiz opening brief due 07/25/2019. Appellees Def Jam Records, Inc., Does, Maybach Music Group, LLC, William Leonard Roberts II and Universal Music Group, Inc. answering brief due 08/26/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11311005] (RT) [Entered: 05/28/2019 05:01 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Raul Caiz v. William Roberts, II, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1 through 10, inclusive | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MAYBACH MUSIC GROUP, LLC, a Florida Limited Liability Company | |
| Represented By: | Craig Holden |
| Represented By: | Joshua S. Hodas Ph. D. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: WILLIAM LEONARD ROBERTS II, an individual, AKA Mastermind, AKA Rick Ross | |
| Represented By: | Craig Holden |
| Represented By: | Joshua S. Hodas Ph. D. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., a California Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Craig Holden |
| Represented By: | Joshua S. Hodas Ph. D. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: DEF JAM RECORDS, INC., Delaware Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Craig Holden |
| Represented By: | Joshua S. Hodas Ph. D. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: RAUL CAIZ, individually | |
| Represented By: | Kris Demirjian |
| Represented By: | Sevag Demirjian |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
