Carla Masterson v. The Walt Disney Company, et al
| DISNEY INTERACTIVE STUDIOS, INC., PIXAR, DISNEY SHOPPING, INC., PETE DOCTER, RONNIE DEL CARMEN, DISNEY ENTERPRISES, INC., JOSH COOLEY, MICHAEL ARNDT, THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY, DISNEY CONSUMER PRODUCTS AND INTERACTIVE MEDIA, INC. and MEG LEFAUVE |
| CARLA JO MASTERSON |
| 19-55650 |
| June 7, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CARLA MASTERSON V. THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 19, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11370199] (CL) [Entered: 07/19/2019 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. By 07/03/2019, counsel for all parties intending to file briefs in this matter are requested to inform the Circuit Mediator by email of their clients' views on whether the issues on appeal or the underlying dispute might be amenable to settlement presently or in the foreseeable future. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested... This communication should not be filed with the court... The existing briefing schedule remains in effect... [11337469] (CL) [Entered: 06/19/2019 01:47 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/12/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11327720] (AD) [Entered: 06/12/2019 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Carla Jo Masterson Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/12/2019. [11327709] [19-55650] (Booke, Bradley) [Entered: 06/12/2019 05:45 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Carla Jo Masterson Correspondence: Representation Statement (not filed with Notice of Appeal in District Court). Date of service: 06/08/2019 [11324175] [19-55650] (Booke, Bradley) [Entered: 06/08/2019 08:58 AM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Joseph Hawkins Low IV substituted by Attorney Bradley Louis Booke. [11324075] (RL) [Entered: 06/07/2019 04:49 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Bradley L. Booke for Appellant Carla Jo Masterson. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Joseph Hawkins Low, IV, Esquire for Appellant Carla Jo Masterson. Date of service: 06/07/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11324071] [19-55650] (Booke, Bradley) [Entered: 06/07/2019 04:47 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/14/2019. Transcript ordered by 07/08/2019. Transcript due 08/05/2019. Appellant Carla Jo Masterson opening brief due 09/16/2019. Appellees Michael Arndt, Josh Cooley, Ronnie Del Carmen, Disney Consumer Products and Interactive Media, Inc., Disney Enterprises, Inc., Disney Interactive Studios, Inc., Disney Shopping, Inc., Pete Docter, Meg Lefauve, Pixar and The Walt Disney Company answering brief due 10/15/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11323053] (JBS) [Entered: 06/07/2019 09:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
