Manufacturing Automation and S v. Kristopher Hughes, et al
| PCVUE, INC. and EDWARD NUGENT |
| MANUFACTURING AUTOMATION AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS, INC. |
| KRISTOPHER HUGHES, INFORMATRAC, INC. and JAMES HUYSENTRUYT |
| 19-55691 |
| June 18, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The dial-in assessment conference scheduled for July 18, 2019, is taken off calendar. This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant further settlement discussions. [11362134] [19-55691, 19-55736] (BS) [Entered: 07/12/2019 02:36 PM] |
| Filing 8 Added Attorney(s) Gregory Alan Nylen for party(s) Appellant Kristopher Hughes Appellant James Huysentruyt Appellant InformaTrac, Inc., in case 19-55691. [11361910] (NAC) [Entered: 07/12/2019 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Gregory Alan Nylen (Lobb & Plewe, LLP, 4160 Temescal Canyon Rd., Suite 202, Corona, CA 92883) for Appellants Kristopher Hughes, James Huysentruyt and InformaTrac, Inc.. Date of service: 07/12/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11361816] [19-55691] (Nylen, Gregory) [Entered: 07/12/2019 12:02 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 07/18/2019, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [11353627] [19-55691, 19-55736] (BS) [Entered: 07/03/2019 11:44 AM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 06/28/2019. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[11349427][19-55691] (AD) [Entered: 06/28/2019 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Kristopher Hughes, James Huysentruyt and InformaTrac, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 06/28/2019. [11348596] [19-55691] (Abbott, Kevin) [Entered: 06/28/2019 12:54 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kevin James Abbott for Appellants Kristopher Hughes, James Huysentruyt and InformaTrac, Inc.. Date of service: 06/28/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11348194] [19-55691] (Abbott, Kevin) [Entered: 06/28/2019 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellants have filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellants shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal pursuant to Ninth Cir. R. 42-1. [11344896] (LW) [Entered: 06/26/2019 10:06 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Mediation Questionnaire due on 06/25/2019. Transcript ordered by 07/17/2019. Transcript due 08/16/2019. Appellants Kristopher Hughes, James Huysentruyt and InformaTrac, Inc. opening brief due 09/25/2019. Appellee Manufacturing Automation and Software Systems, Inc. answering brief due 10/25/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11335612] (RT) [Entered: 06/18/2019 11:54 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
