Gregory Franklin v. A. Martinez, et al
| L. JACKSON, Chief Deputy Warden, in his/her official capacity, S. RIVERA, Lieutenant, in his/her individual and official capacity, R. SUTTON, Lieutenant, in individual and official capacity, LUGO, Lieutenant, in his/her individual and official capacity, SOTO, L. E. MCEWEN, Acting Warden, in his/her individual and official capacity, O'NEAL, Administrative Law Judge, Correctional Officer, in his/her official capacity, NEAL, Correctional Officer, in his/her individual and official capacity and MEADOR, Captain, in his/her individual and official capacity |
| A. H. MARTINEZ, Lieutenant, in individual and official capacity, B. BOJOROQUEZ, Correctional Officer, in individual and official capacity, C. WOFFORD, Warden, in individual and official capacity, L. ROWE, Senior Librarian, in individual and official capacity and B. HARRIS, Appeal Coordinator, in individual and official capacity |
| GREGORY ALLEN FRANKLIN |
| 19-55726 |
| June 24, 2019 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [11400466] (CKP) [Entered: 08/16/2019 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: th): Granting Appellant's Motion [ # 6 ] to extend time to file the opening brief. Appellant Gregory Allen Franklin opening brief due 09/23/2019. Appellees B. Bojoroquez, B. Harris, A. H. Martinez, L. Rowe and C. Wofford answering brief due 10/23/2019. The appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. This order was issued prior to the expiration of time within which a response may be filed. Fed. R. App. P. 27(b). [11400059] (TH) [Entered: 08/16/2019 12:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 08/08/2019. [11399821] (RR) [Entered: 08/16/2019 11:15 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Gregory Allen Franklin motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief until 09/23/2019. Deficiencies: No certificate of service. [11399818] (RR) [Entered: 08/16/2019 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 5 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [11386761] (CKP) [Entered: 08/05/2019 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 4 Attorney Neculai Catalin Grecea in 19-55726 substituted by Attorney Byron M. Miller in 19-55726 [11361271] (RR) [Entered: 07/11/2019 05:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Byron M. Miller (Office of the Attorney General, 1300 I Street, P.O. Box 944255, Sacramento, CA 94244-2550) for Appellees A. H. Martinez, B. Bojoroquez, C. Wofford, B. Harris and L. Rowe. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Neculai Catalin Grecea, Esquire for Appellees B. Bojoroquez, B. Harris, A. H. Martinez, L. Rowe and C. Wofford. Date of service: 07/11/2019. (Party previously proceeding without counsel: No) [11361222] [19-55726] (Miller, Byron) [Entered: 07/11/2019 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [11346771] (CKP) [Entered: 06/27/2019 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gregory Allen Franklin opening brief due 08/22/2019. Appellees B. Bojoroquez, B. Harris, A. H. Martinez, L. Rowe and C. Wofford answering brief due 09/23/2019. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11342832] (HC) [Entered: 06/24/2019 04:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
